data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55044/55044303a563d0285d50d6a853d7d87bf704cd53" alt=""
Hi NCCS! :-) As you probably have noticed your WG chair job responsibilities are shifting since there are active PDP policy proposals in your WG. It seems you forgot to put those proposals on your agenda :-) If you need help/advice/guidance/etc on running PDP stuff please don't hesitate to ask those of us who have more experience. I was just talking with Gert about Erik Bais' new proposal about asking the NCC to do resource certification for non-members: “Resource Certification for organizations who are not RIPE NCC members”. Which WG does this belong in? The previous certification policy proposals have been in AP, but people have asked me why they were in AP instead of in NCCS. This new proposal is again on the border between our WGs. What do you think? And do you feel up to taking on this proposal or would you prefer us to handle it? It is one of those proposals that might be easy, or it might need a lot of guidance behind the scenes (guidance of the proposer that is, we don't do back-room deals ;-) Sorry if I seem to be involving myself too much in your WG, but the stuff in NCCS is important to the community and we can't afford to let things slip here. No offence intended! But help is offered :-) Cheers, Sander
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55044/55044303a563d0285d50d6a853d7d87bf704cd53" alt=""
Oh damn! This message was meant to go to the chairs, not to the list. My sincere apologies!!!!! Sander
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ece1/5ece12c69ed01c92394a192552f62b79147e69c2" alt=""
sander, i am torn. erik's proposal is not address allocation per se. it is about services. otoh, to maintain my reputation for tact, it would be nice to have active chairs helping the community to focus and progress through the consensus process. randy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55044/55044303a563d0285d50d6a853d7d87bf704cd53" alt=""
Hi,
i am torn. erik's proposal is not address allocation per se. it is about services. otoh, to maintain my reputation for tact, it would be nice to have active chairs helping the community to focus and progress through the consensus process.
Well, I know how simple and easy it seems from the outside and how difficult and confusing it can get. Cheers, Sander
participants (2)
-
Randy Bush
-
Sander Steffann