Hi All I like to have an explanation too. As I also work for SwissIX (a non for profit Exchange in Switzerland) and we have tried to get a DB mirror to build filters against. Regards Matthias On 02/01/13 10:21, Sander Steffann wrote:
Hi Job,
I looked a bit further and you are right. The activity plan as documented in http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-558 is *not* the same as the one that the members voted on which was announced (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000612.ht...) and published at http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/september-2012/documents/draft-ripe-.... Appendix 1, which lists the proxy service as member-only, has been inserted *after* the members voted on it.
This is so very wrong and totally unacceptable. Now I really demand an explanation from the board!
Met vriendelijke groet, Sander Steffann
Op 2 jan. 2013 om 00:28 heeft Job Snijders <job.snijders@atrato-ip.com <mailto:job.snijders@atrato-ip.com>> het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl <mailto:sander@steffann.nl>> wrote:
IMHO the proxy service should have never been included in the member-only-services list, and I suspect that many members didn't realize the impact of approving this change in the activity plane. ` I don't recall approving this change. In the draft [1] published in August 2012 also no mention of making the Proxy Service "members only".
Kind regards,
Job
[1] http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/september-2012/documents/draft-ripe-...
-- Matthias Cramer / mc322-ripe Senior Network & Security Engineer iway AG Phone +41 43 500 1111 Badenerstrasse 569 Fax +41 44 271 3535 CH-8048 Zurich http://www.iway.ch/ GnuPG 1024D/2D208250 = DBC6 65B6 7083 1029 781E 3959 B62F DF1C 2D20 8250