* Sergey Myasoedov
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
LIRs are not running networks with PI addressing LIRs may very well be running networks with PI addressing (I do!), so as a blanket statement, the above is false.
Oh yes, but I believe we are talking about PIs with non-published LIR<->End User relationship. When PI owner become an LIR, the LIR normally become a sponsoring organization and it is easy to see and to get a contact details.
In the case when LIR will not sponsor its own PI object, what is the point of publishing sponsor's regid?
I wasn't talking about my own PI blocks, I was talking about my customer's. Which are used on networks I run for them. In the end it's all integers anyway, and I'll happily operate those integers for my customers regardless of labels and how they were obtained, including (but not limited to): - PA addresses issued by my own LIR - PA addresses issued by another LIR - PI addresses sponsored by my own LIR - PI addresses sponsored by another LIR (Same shit, different wrapping. My routers cannot tell the difference.) In the case of PA blocks, the issuing LIR is always published in the database and on the FTP. The issuing LIR might very well have absolutely *nothing* to do with the End User's operational use of the addresses in question, yet we publish it. I don't see why PI addresses and their sponsoring LIRs should be treated any different than PA addresses and their issuing LIR in this regard. Tore