2 Oct
2003
2 Oct
'03
2:08 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:39:28PM +0200, Olaf M. Kolkman wrote:
Below you find a proposal for restructuring of parts of the reverse DNS services.
IMHO, a very good idea.
- Once a delegation at a /16 boundary is made the more specific /24 domain objects are ignored.
Hm. This has to consequences which I can see off-hand: - lesser delegations in the RIPE-operated zone files - higher resolution delays as more indirection is involved Is there something I'm missing? And: you're saying that this is part of a filter between the database and the actual zone file generation. Wouldn't this introduce possible inconsistencies between DNS data and database data? Best regards, Daniel