* Sascha Luck
I'm afraid that every objection made to 2008-08 (which proposal failed to achieve consensus) applies exactly the same to this proposal. Rather than re-iterating every argument here again, I refer to the original thread re. 2008-08:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2011-May/005737.htm...
If I read it correctly, the linked to argument is against RPKI as a whole. However, 2013-04 isn't a question on whether we should do RPKI or not, but whether or not our *existing* RPKI stuff should be extended to include non-members. I think it should. If we're doing something to begin with, we shouldn't be doing it half-arsed. So I support the policy. I've got one question though. What is the rationale for the requirement that «the Internet resources reside within the RIPE NCC service region»? I don't see the reason for this. IMHO, any PI/legacy space issued/maintained by the RIPE NCC should be eligible for certification under this policy, no matter where on (or off!) the planet it's being used. Tore