On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:44:09AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
This allowed the RIPE NCC to dispense with the direct relationship arrangement for 2013 onwards (even though I note that they didn't ask or receive RIPE community support for a policy proposal to back this change), which has reduced the number of contract templates they need to deal with by one.
Thanks for reminding. I've missed to recall this change in the direct relationship arrangement as well as the fact ripe-518 is updated by ripe-569 to reflect it. Mea culpa. The policy ripe-452 (final 2007-01 proposal) doesn't elaborate on the means of establishing a direct contractual link between the End User and the RIPE NCC. Thus no obligation for RIPE NCC to ask or receive RIPE community support for a change in the policy aspect implementation. My appologies to Nick and Daniel. Martin