Change of plan: see below. On 20 Apr 2006, at 20:43, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 20 Apr 2006, at 06:09, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 19 Apr 2006, at 15:08, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: Option 3
Z. AOB I'm not sure whether this is within scope, or Option 1 better mentioned in the NCC-services WG, Option 2 or just simply discussed over coffee with an NCC person.
A colleague in a sister organization here in Ireland has recently had an experience which leads me to think that it would be useful to have some consistency checking between address assignments and the corresponding IN-ADDR.ARPA domains, at least at the /16 level. See you all next week. /Niall Let us try to do (2) first, then maybe (1), both before Friday morning. Then we can still do (3) and try to bring it up in DB under AOB. Wilfried.
Thanks, Wilfried. That sounds like a plan.
Conversations with a number of people here at RIPE 52, including some WG-co-chairs and some NCC experts, lead me to believe that this episode doesn't, on its own, indicate a sufficiently broad class of problems to warrant action. We should probably review the position if similar problems arise in the future. We don't need to take meeting time for this. /Niall