Dear Antoin, It is certainly possible to add a new organisation object type, like "ENUM", to be specifically used by the ENUM registries. This would involve the changes to the RIPE Database. I suggest you to contact ENUM-WG and DB-WG working group chairs to check first whether this change would require only a mailing list consensus or PDP, and then maybe put together a proposal for ENUM-WG and DB-WG and submit it to the appropriate mailing lists. -- Katie Petrusha RIPE NCC
From: "Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren@sidn.nl> Date: 4 September 2006 2:26:40PM GMT+02:00 To: <enum-wg@ripe.net> Cc: <ncc-services-wg@ripe.net> Subject: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385 Message-Id: <B33086268D53A0429A3AA2774C83892CDC5850@KAEVS1.SIDN.local>
Guys,
I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I found out when I had to use them last week.
The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the registration.
This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field.
I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world, but I do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM.
Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries here ?
Antoin Verschuren
Technical Advisor Policy & Business Development SIDN Utrechtseweg 310 PO Box 5022 6802 EA Arnhem The Netherlands
T +31 26 3525510 F +31 26 3525505 M +31 6 23368970 E antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl W http://www.sidn.nl/