Andrey, On Thursday, 2013-01-03 16:03:28 +0200, Andrey Semenchuk <andrey@trifle.net> wrote:
Shane Kerr wrote:
On Wednesday, 2013-01-02 20:43:33 +0200, Andrey Semenchuk <andrey@trifle.net> wrote:
2. Data must provide contact information to any parties to be able to communicate with the person who described by the personal data object ============================================================================== In this case personal data provided and processed in the same way and purpose that they were collected and no restrictions should be used
An alternate approach would be for the RIPE NCC to act as a go-between for communicating with resource holders.
Actually this method was proposed in the letter you quote :) It will not work with phone numbers but with the emails - it will work. And already works for some public organisations which operates with personal data in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC. So RIPE has nothing to devise in this situation
Oh, I see. I should read more carefully. One slight difference is that I don't propose any particular mechanism, including where or how data is stored, or how messages are received or transmitted. I'm glad that other organisations have figured this out, and that we can happily copy what they have done. :) Cheers, -- Shane