14 Feb
2013
14 Feb
'13
9:42 p.m.
On 17 Oct 2012, at 20:11, Randy Bush wrote:
this one seems a no brainer to me. it's just part of proper and open documentation of registration and allocation, the ncc's primary job.
as far as the lir not wanting to be known to have sponsored a pi site, if the lir is ashamed of doing something, maybe they should not have done it. i just don't get this stuff.
correct and open documentation is the ncc's primary job.
I'm surprised this hasn't been fixed before, supported. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no