data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70927/7092736ebd15a9340af0b6270009eae3bfecd9f2" alt=""
28 Mar
2013
28 Mar
'13
5:50 p.m.
On 27/03/2013 16:18, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Less formally, this is intended to mean that the NCC should
- not curtail service; - not be obliged to implement any missing service element; and - have scope to act to improve the accuracy of the data held.
I hope this helps, and encourage you to ask if it doesn't help enough.
I think it helps to clarify the scope of the proposal, but suspect that paying a service fee for registration services creates an implicit contract between the legacy resource holder and the RIPE NCC. No doubt the NCC will be able to clarify this. Nick