that being said, i may be a minority voice among ripe ncc membership on this issue. what i am asking for is that ripe ncc break down all their functions - and "ask/poll" its paying membership which to continue and which not to pursue. example: if the majority are in favor of funding ripe ncc training, i will have no problem with it. i will even become an advocate for it.
This is something I would agree on. Break down the functions, ask the members, and then do what the majority wants.
Even more important. I would like to see the projects progress reported at the NCC services WG at each RIPE meeting, and perhaps also a general cost structure. Not that I want to now what each member in the project costs, but I want to see the general relationship between that project and overall cost figures. Best regards, - kurtis -