30 Mar
2013
30 Mar
'13
1:24 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Philipp Kern <philipp.kern@kit.edu> wrote:
ISO-8859-1 *and* UTF-8 content seems a tad ridiculous and backwards.
I should have explained the rationale behind this suggestion, sorry. What it boils down to is that normal text would use the standard ASCII chars and only names and references would be allowed to use UTF-8. A different, and maybe better, way to put this is "UTF-8 for the document, but use only ASCII chars within the main text". Richard