29 Aug
2012
29 Aug
'12
2:09 p.m.
Hi Nigel, On 29.08.2012 13:59, Nigel Titley wrote:
maybe it should be looked at the other way round: that legacy space holders as good netizens want to unilaterally move this address space under a policy, given that the policy serves their needs and views? Well, actually the proposal explicitly precludes moving the address space under normal address policy. It explicitly says that "...[such future revisions] must never restrict the rights of Legacy Resource Holders to their legacy resources."
that is why I wrote "under _A_ policy" - that doesn't necessarily mean normal address policy. :-) Best, -C.