Hi,
Just to explain a bit of rational behind the agenda to you and others.
Thanks, Kurtis.
+1
We have the allocated slot on the agenda and I believe it's to late to shuffle around. In hind sight perhaps we should have expected this and asked for more time.
[...]
I'ld also suggest that proposers and Emilio take the opportunity to do some behind-the-scenes homework early in the week of RIPE 66 in order to minimize the risk of having to spend scarce meeting time resolving any confusion which may arise.
+1
However, building on what Emilio tells us from the APWG experience, the updates of ongoing policies normally don't take that long or have that much discussion. We might be wrong of course, but we have to guess at something.
Absolutely. You have to guess at something, and I expect Sander and Gert have used just this method over the years to reach their current level of expertise on shepherding policy proposals through the process.
Absolutely. Lots of guessing is involved, and sometimes we guess wrong. In APWG we have the benefit of usually having so many proposals on the table that it tends to balance out :-) Cheers, Sander