Hi, On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm in favour of the this proposal. ^ still
+1 And I do see a certain responsibility on the side of a sponsoring LIR to enable communication to the holder of the address space - after all, this *is* the role of the "sponsoring LIR": facilitate a contractual path between the NCC and the address space holder. If you think that your "sponsoring LIR clients" will cause lots of abuse mails to be sent to you, maybe you should not make them customers in the first place - or add a clause to your contracts that abuse handling will be billed to the customer (if they are responsible)? (OTOH, I'm not feeling really strong about this, so I won't enter a mudfight for it) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279