Rob Evans wrote:
Hi, [...] I (personally, of course) support this proposal.
So do I, in general, with the 2 caveats: - it is not clear, how the NCC will handle "really old" bits and pieces, for which back then there was no concept of "documentation" yet, other than receiving it (over the phone or other comms.channel) and starting to use it as intended. Being too strict in this case may actually defeat the goal of getting as much as possible of that stuff under a contractual umbrella. and 2ndly - given the other proposal to extend Certification to PI resources, I wonder whether we need a separate/different approch for LEGACY, and why the option of GM was not included in the IA, Section "Resource Certification", like in other items? Any comments? Wilfried.