1 Nov
2013
1 Nov
'13
6:38 p.m.
On 01/11/2013 17:27, Sander Steffann wrote:
Section 2.4 is redundant. We have a well established precedent under the terms of 2007-01 for engaging with sponsoring LIRs and this seems to work well in practice. Creating this policy option merely adds cost to the RIPE NCC's bottom line for no gain.
This option actually comes from 2007-01, which created RIPE-452:
It does indeed - the point wasn't lost on me. However the NCC membership approved an NCC board proposal in Nov 2011 that it would no longer provide this option, and now there is no such option available for PI holders. In retrospect I think this is a more sensible way of handling the contractual relationship. Nick