
4 Feb
2013
4 Feb
'13
12:38 p.m.
On 04/02/2013 11:11, Sleigh, Robert wrote:
It provides for several options relating to the engagement between the legacy holders and RIPE, in recognition of the wide range of organisations who are legacy holders.
It also provides multiple options for LRHs to completely ignore the RIPE NCC forever. I don't believe that this constitutes good stewardship of resource registration on the part of the RIPE NCC. Nick