Hi Job, I looked a bit further and you are right. The activity plan as documented in http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-558 is *not* the same as the one that the members voted on which was announced (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000612.ht...) and published at http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/september-2012/documents/draft-ripe-.... Appendix 1, which lists the proxy service as member-only, has been inserted *after* the members voted on it. This is so very wrong and totally unacceptable. Now I really demand an explanation from the board! Met vriendelijke groet, Sander Steffann Op 2 jan. 2013 om 00:28 heeft Job Snijders <job.snijders@atrato-ip.com> het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
IMHO the proxy service should have never been included in the member-only-services list, and I suspect that many members didn't realize the impact of approving this change in the activity plane. ` I don't recall approving this change. In the draft [1] published in August 2012 also no mention of making the Proxy Service "members only".
Kind regards,
Job
[1] http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/september-2012/documents/draft-ripe-...