On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote:
What I don't understand now: where is the need for the PI-owner to stay more or less anonymous and the NCC over three edges to follow up on that..
Nonono, the PI "owner" is never anonymous, they must be registered in the db, there has to be a contract and the NCC makes sure the user exists (the LIR can't even do that themselves!)
Just to keep a LIR's customers secret can't be the main argument - or again - is unfair - as if I remember policies right, as LIR with PA I have to tell in DB my customer..
Well, IMO that deserves some review as well from a privacy POV but is not part of this proposal. However, PA space is different as that is "owned" by the LIR and merely assigned to the end-user. That makes the LIR responsible for the actions of the assignee (via AUP etc). rgds, Sascha