if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a proposal at all? because the founding fathers and mothers, who have been quietly minding their own business for a couple of decades received nasty letters from the ncc? The person at the NCC who sent those letters has had a sharp kick up the
On 29/08/2012 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: posterior.
because the founding partents actually are trying to be part of the family of their children and grandchildren?
Indeed... but I was asking a more fundamental question. If the PDP has no jurisdiction over the legacy holders then why are the legacy holders invoking a process which they are avowing has no jurisdiction over them? Please understand this is a somewhat mischievious question, but one that I feel needs to be answered. Nigel
randy