On 18 Oct 2007, at 08:50, Jim Reid wrote:
[Carsten Schiefner wrote]
Rather it would only do so at the active and explicit request of the respective ENUM Tier 1 registry - which turns your argument upside-down IMHO.
Er, it was me who was recommending that any monitoring would only be done at the request of the Administration concerned. For some vague definition of "Administration" which could include the Tier1 registry.
From all of this discussion, I suggest the following three points as a basis for agreement. (1) Clarity on the "service envelope" for DNSMON is desirable; (2) Tier-1 ENUM zones are eligible for monitoring by DNSMON; (3) A request for DNSMON monitoring of a Tier-1 ENUM zone will be accepted from a "responsible party" ("Administration", Tier-1 operator, National Regulator, ...) relevant to the zone in question. I hope this helps. /Niall