On 5 Feb 2013, at 14:30, Randy Bush wrote:
that was not the intent
the sentence of 2.6 you quote would seem to refer to services NOW being provided to lrhs, which do not include certification.
+1 This is intended to ensure operational continuity per service/resource pair, not to create back-door access either to new services or to current services not already provided for a specific resource. An informal summary of the subsections in section 2 might read 2.1 .. 2.3: business as usual; 2.4: new business process for when "usual" doesn't fit a specific case; 2.5: exceptional accommodation for hard cases; 2.6: do no harm.
but any tweaks to wording to make things clearer greatly appreciated, i am sure.
Absolutely, and especially from anyone who sees a divergence between what is in the proposal and what I've offered as a summary above. /Niall