-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a proposal at all? because the founding partents actually are trying to be part of the family of their children and grandchildren? Indeed... but I was asking a more fundamental question. If the PDP has no jurisdiction over the legacy holders then why are the legacy holders invoking a process which they are avowing has no jurisdiction over them?
the pdp may have no current juristiction. but what is attempting to be negotiated is for the pdp to have juristiction. do you have a suggestion for a different approach/venue?
Please understand this is a somewhat mischievious question, but one that I feel needs to be answered.
all taken in good humor and assuming good intent. we have a wonderful opportunity to take the high ground here, maintain humor, assume the best of intent, and set a civilized example. randy, pgp signing because some will not believe i wrote that :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJQPfkdAAoJEMzMBey4OgLtPt0IAKUj1JjtfD9qIAmldYue94bO FgRooqSYvJQn5y5kSuA5+7fqr/r/DK3Si17tWQy7qVSBHoH5eVhwOn5XmxInYWNt JnxJn09keIxInpC8yNKTktMuvtK45jWGPEnWw1qhgfDyWYdYE7hwH9HRcEY/egbo IQrnfR1P45P+fD7197fFlBv0YQoGBKMn2ElBgf0e4QmUfs+isKIJ7KWa9+5qT+Bt NdjEgsF9IB7w+r4RmDD/uRe7p5HCuKJ7VkRTCImGXhiVNF7+cHenM8nIztZhpEbj Hou3VBeDvA1aWTxiRqdX3nItTPH6S6pI36JvRvBs2v2ZmEN2QH381ggu1aYd/68= =xLHU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----