28 Mar
2013
28 Mar
'13
6:15 p.m.
On 28 Mar 2013, at 16:50, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/03/2013 16:18, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Less formally, this is intended to mean that the NCC should
- not curtail service; - not be obliged to implement any missing service element; and - have scope to act to improve the accuracy of the data held.
I hope this helps, and encourage you to ask if it doesn't help enough.
I think it helps to clarify the scope of the proposal, but suspect that paying a service fee for registration services creates an implicit contract between the legacy resource holder and the RIPE NCC. No doubt the NCC will be able to clarify this.
I'm looking forward to seeing the Impact Analysis. /N