On 13 Sep 2012, at 14:43, Randy Bush wrote:
[Peter Koch]
Looking forward to the edited next version.
as are many. i think folk are figuring out how to do that within the rule trap into which it has fallen.
Besides, we have to finish editing it first. 8-) One of the slides I'm drafting, and which I expect will be shown at RIPE 65, currently looks like this: -------- Policy Proposal 2012-07 (version 2) * Shorter * No need to itemize defence of what is not under threat * Focus: * registration and related services * fair access to services for legacy resource holders -------- It may save us all much time and effort if further discussion on this list is focussed along these lines, as indeed some of the discussion to date has been. ATB /Niall