May 2018 - ncc-services-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Draft Agenda RIPE76 - NCC Services Working Group
by Bijal Sanghani 16 May '18

16 May '18

Dear all, Below and shortly online you can find the NCC Services working group draft agenda, any additions or comments please let me know. Best regards, NCC Services working group chairs === Date: Wednesday 16 May 2018 Time: 16.00 - 17.45 Chair: Kurtis Lindqvist Co-Chair: Bijal Sanghani A. Administrative Matters (5 minutes) Welcome Select a scribe Finalise agenda Approve minutes from RIPE 75 https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services/minutes/ripe-75-ripe-ncc-… <https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services/minutes/ripe-69-ripe-ncc-…> B. RIPE NCC Update Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC (20 minutes) C. Knowing our Members and building communities Hisham Ibrahim, RIPE NCC (20 minutes) D. RIPE Community Project Fund Alastair Strachan, RIPE NCC (15 minutes) E. GDPR Implementation at the RIPE NCC Maria Stafyla, RIPE NCC (20 minutes) F. RIPE NCC Arbitration Procedures Arbiter Name, RIPE NCC Arbiter (15 minutes) G. Open Microphone Session (5 minutes) Z. Any other business

1 1

Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
by Artyom Gavrichenkov 09 May '18

09 May '18

Hi all, During a call for papers for each meeting organized by RIPE NCC, a speaker is expected to provide an abstract for each submission of a plenary talk. These abstracts are then evaluated by the corresponding programme committee. They serve a purpose of providing an outline of the presentation, key points and topics covered in the talk. E.g. sometimes the title of a submission isn't in any way self-explanatory, but the abstract helps the programme committee members to quickly get an idea of what's going to be presented and whether it is relevant to the interests of the community. However, these abstracts are not published together with the agenda, they aren't even available in the mailing list -- though even that would be sort of suboptimal in my opinion, but anyway -- they're just getting lost forever. I believe it would be much appreciated by the audience if those abstracts for accepted submissions are published on the Web site of a meeting together with plenary agenda. A title itself often doesn't tell the audience a lot about the content of the talk, while an abstract certainly does. Say, once we had a submission for the ENOG meeting -- accepted later for no less than an opening plenary session -- called "Operating a secure network" -- go figure! NANOG meetings, APRICOT and other conferences do maintain a policy of publishing this ahead of an event, along with the agenda. Maybe there's a solid reason why NCC avoids doing that? I don't know, but I'll be glad to figure out. Any opinions on this one? | Artyom Gavrichenkov | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 | mailto: ximaera(a)gmail.com | fb: ximaera | telegram: xima_era | skype: xima_era | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58

3 2

Re: [ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
by Adam Castle 09 May '18

09 May '18

Hi Artyom and all, Thanks for bringing this up. We can discuss this request for publishing presentation abstracts with the RIPE and ENOG PCs at the upcoming RIPE and ENOG meetings. We've discussed such ideas before with the RIPE PC and at RIPE 76 we've applied a feature that presenters can add their own bio, if they want to, which will be associated with their presentation. An example of this can be seen on - https://ripe76.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/plenary/ under the TTLd: Total TCP Loss detection presentation. We will keep you updated. Many thanks, Adam Castle Web Services Manager RIPE NCC >>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera(a)gmail.com <mailto:ximaera@gmail.com> <mailto:ximaera@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> During a call for papers for each meeting organized by RIPE NCC, a >>>> speaker >>>> is expected to provide an abstract for each submission of a plenary >>>> talk. >>>> These abstracts are then evaluated by the corresponding programme >>>> committee. They serve a purpose of providing an outline of the >>>> presentation, key points and topics covered in the talk. >>>> >>>> E.g. sometimes the title of a submission isn't in any way >>>> self-explanatory, >>>> but the abstract helps the programme committee members to quickly get an >>>> idea of what's going to be presented and whether it is relevant to the >>>> interests of the community. >>>> >>>> However, these abstracts are not published together with the agenda, >>>> they >>>> aren't even available in the mailing list -- though even that would >>>> be sort >>>> of suboptimal in my opinion, but anyway -- they're just getting lost >>>> forever. >>>> >>>> I believe it would be much appreciated by the audience if those >>>> abstracts >>>> for accepted submissions are published on the Web site of a meeting >>>> together with plenary agenda. A title itself often doesn't tell the >>>> audience a lot about the content of the talk, while an abstract >>>> certainly >>>> does. Say, once we had a submission for the ENOG meeting -- accepted >>>> later >>>> for no less than an opening plenary session -- called "Operating a >>>> secure >>>> network" -- go figure! >>>> >>>> NANOG meetings, APRICOT and other conferences do maintain a policy of >>>> publishing this ahead of an event, along with the agenda. Maybe >>>> there's a >>>> solid reason why NCC avoids doing that? I don't know, but I'll be >>>> glad to >>>> figure out. >>>> >>>> Any opinions on this one? >>>> >>>> | Artyom Gavrichenkov >>>> | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 >>>> | mailto: ximaera(a)gmail.com <mailto:ximaera@gmail.com> <mailto:ximaera@gmail.com> >>>> | fb: ximaera >>>> | telegram: xima_era >>>> | skype: xima_era >>>> | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58 >>>> >>>> >>

1 0