April 2013 - ncc-services-wg - mailman.ripe.net

[training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
by Training Mailbox 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

[Apologies for duplicate e-mails] Dear colleagues, We are pleased to announce the launch of new dates for our Webinars for LIRs. The RIPE NCC Webinars are live, one hour online training courses that allow participants to interact with our trainers without leaving their desks. We focus on the topics and issues most important for LIRs. Register now at https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/training/e-learning/webinars Participation is limited to 20 people, so don't hesitate if you want to take part! If you have questions, please email<e-learning(a)ripe.net>. We look forward to seeing you online. Kind regards, RIPE NCC Training Services

2 2

NCC Services WG Draft Agenda - RIPE 66
by Bijal Sanghani 07 May '13

07 May '13

Dear All, Please see below and online the Draft Agenda for the NCC Services WG at RIPE 66 - https://ripe66.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/services-wg/ regards, Bijal === Date: Wednesday 15 May 2013 Time: 16.00 - 17.45 Chair: Kurtis Lindqvist Co-Chair: Bijal Sanghani A. Administrative Matters (5 minutes) Welcome Select a scribe Finalise agenda Approve minutes from RIPE 65 B. Report from RIPE NCC - Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC (25 minutes) C. RIPE NCC Survey 2013 - Serge Radovcic, RIPE NCC (20 minutes) D. Internet Governance update - Paul Rendek, RIPE NCC (20 minutes) E. Registration Services update - Andrew de la Haye (20 minutes) F. Open Microphone Session Z. AOB

6 15

PDP stuff
by Sander Steffann 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

Hi NCCS! :-) As you probably have noticed your WG chair job responsibilities are shifting since there are active PDP policy proposals in your WG. It seems you forgot to put those proposals on your agenda :-) If you need help/advice/guidance/etc on running PDP stuff please don't hesitate to ask those of us who have more experience. I was just talking with Gert about Erik Bais' new proposal about asking the NCC to do resource certification for non-members: “Resource Certification for organizations who are not RIPE NCC members”. Which WG does this belong in? The previous certification policy proposals have been in AP, but people have asked me why they were in AP instead of in NCCS. This new proposal is again on the border between our WGs. What do you think? And do you feel up to taking on this proposal or would you prefer us to handle it? It is one of those proposals that might be easy, or it might need a lot of guidance behind the scenes (guidance of the proposer that is, we don't do back-room deals ;-) Sorry if I seem to be involving myself too much in your WG, but the stuff in NCCS is important to the community and we can't afford to let things slip here. No offence intended! But help is offered :-) Cheers, Sander

2 3

[news] Policy Proposal 2012-09 "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments" implemented
by Marisol Estrada 25 Apr '13

25 Apr '13

[Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that RIPE policy proposal 2012-09, "Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments", has been implemented. The RIPE NCC is now ready to accept requests for temporary assignments under this policy. The full proposal can be found at: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-09> The updated "Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies" document is available at: <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-587> The "Temporary Internet Number Assignment Request Form " can be found at: <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-586> The supporting notes can be found at: <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-585> If you have any questions, please contact <ncc(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Marisol Estrada RIPE NCC

1 0

2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
by Marco Schmidt 25 Apr '13

25 Apr '13

Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-07, "RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-07 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-07/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net before 23 May 2013. Regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Office RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
by Sascha Luck 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-08 To recap: my main point of contention with this proposal is that it creates a perception of responsibility of the sponsoring LIR for the actions of the end user - which does not exist beyond keeping the ripedb updated. Thus it creates an attack surface for those who see it as their duty to keep the internet free of <insert agenda here>. Which will make it hard to impossible for a controversial or otherwise inconvenient independent resource holder (or applicant) to find or keep a sponsoring LIR. Impact Statement: "During implementation of this policy, the RIPE NCC will contact those organisations acting as sponsoring LIRs to notify them of this change and allow them time to react appropriately, by reviewing their sponsoring LIR agreements and terminating any they do not want to be associated with (or even all of them)." The wording is ambiguous and may refer to resources "brought in" under 2007-01/Phase III, but it can be read as if a sponsoring LIR will get an opportunity to break a sponsorship contract with an inconvenient end-user, thus orphaning them before an attack even happens. I would ask the NCC to please clarify the intention of this sentence, and note that https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/independent-resources… does specify a notice period of 3 months for termination of the IR contract, otherwise we're looking at a case of Breach of Contract. For the record and the avoidance of doubt: I still oppose this proposal for the above mentioned reason. Kind Regards, Sascha Luck > >We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments >to ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net before 20 May 2013. > >Regards > >Marco Schmidt >Policy Development Office >RIPE NCC > >

2 1

New on RIPE Labs: Introducing the RIPE NCC Roadmap
by Mirjam Kuehne 22 Apr '13

22 Apr '13

Dear colleagues, We often get asked about the status of our different services and projects, and while we frequently publish updates on RIPE Labs, we now have a new tool that makes it easier to stay informed. We're happy to announce the RIPE NCC Roadmap, where you can get an overview of all the latest developments and future plans for these services in one place. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/introducing-ripe-ncc-roadmap This prototype, which is hosted on RIPE Labs, will be further developed as we receive your feedback, so please let us know what you think. Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

1 0

2012-08 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
by Marco Schmidt 22 Apr '13

22 Apr '13

Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-08, "Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-08 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-08/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net before 20 May 2013. Regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Office RIPE NCC

1 0

Certifying of PI End User Address Space
by de Brün, Markus 12 Apr '13

12 Apr '13

Hey Andrew, I was hoping PI-space would eventually be coverd by RPKI. As a PI-space holder, who is not a RIPE NCC member, I would prefer option 2. Since the sponsoring LIR (in our case Deutsche Telekom) already has a contractual relationship with the RIPE NCC, this seems to be the straightforward approach. Option 3 is also okay although I understand the issue of non-members benefiting of RIPE-NCC services. If it comes to that, I am prepared to pay a fee as well ;-) Regards, Markus de Brün

4 4

RPKI Validator 2.8 released
by Alex Band 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

For those of you who use the 5.5 /8s worth of certified address space in the RPKI repository, we just released a new version of the Validator toolset: https://www.ripe.net/certification/tools-and-resources This version now properly handles other types of RPKI objects, such as Ghostbuster records (rfc6493). Cheers, Alex P.S. You can watch it in action here: http://rpki01.fra2.de.euro-transit.net:8080/roas

1 0