September 2006 - ncc-services-wg

RE: [ncc-services-wg] object-type: poem?
by Nigel Titley 28 Sep '06

28 Sep '06

> On 16.08 00:29, Tiberiu Ungureanu wrote: > > while looking for something else, i tripped and fell over this: > > > > $ whois -t poem > > > > poem: [mandatory] [single] [primary/look-up key] > > descr: [optional] [multiple] [ ] > > form: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] > > text: [mandatory] [multiple] [ ] > > admin-c: [mandatory] [multiple] [inverse key] > > author: [mandatory] [multiple] [inverse key] > > remarks: [optional] [multiple] [ ] > > notify: [optional] [multiple] [inverse key] > > mnt-by: [mandatory] [multiple] [inverse key] > > changed: [mandatory] [multiple] [ ] > > source: [mandatory] [single] [ ] > > > > should i take it that RIPE database allow the creative ones to store > > their own poems (as in... poetry?). can anyone point me to > the document > > explaining this object ? > > This object supports activities of "The Secret Working Group", > a long standing tradition at RIPE meetings. > > See http://www.ripe.net/db/news/poem-object-200505.html > for the latest developments concerning this object. But which is slightly out of date. See my (forthcoming) presentation at the RIPE 53 DB-WG session. Nigel

1 0

2005-02 implementation: IP assignments for anycasting DNS
by leo vegoda 26 Sep '06

26 Sep '06

Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that we will be able to accept e-mailed requests for assignments for anycasting DNS servers from 2 October 2006. The request form and supporting notes will be available from the RIPE Document Store at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/internet-registries.html We will make a separate announcement when it is possible to make requests via the LIR Portal. Assignments for anycasting DNS will come from reserved blocks: * IPv4 Anycast Assignments (/24) from 194.0.0.0/18 * IPv6 Anycast Assignments (/48) from 2001:0678::/29 You may want to update your filters. Regards, -- leo vegoda Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

RIPE 53 - NCC Services WG - Draft Agenda
by Sanghani, Bijal 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Dear All, Please see below Draft Agenda for RIPE 53. Regards, Bijal === A. Administrative Matters (5 min) - Welcome - Select a scribe - Distribute participants list - Finalise agenda - Approve minutes from RIPE 52 B. RIPE NCC Update, Vision and Focus 2007: Proposed Changes to Activities in 2007 - Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC 25 minutes C. Training Services Update - Rumy Kanis, RIPE NCC 15 minutes D. Open Mic Z. AOB ********************************************************************** This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and contains information which is or may be confidential, non-public or legally privileged. Any dissemination or distribution of this message other than to its intended recipient is strictly prohibited. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by email to postmaster(a)flagtelecom.com immediately and delete the original message and all copies from all locations in your computer systems. This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for viruses. However, FLAG Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses. ********************************************************************** This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - www.mailcontrol.com

1 0

ripe mailserver responing 4xx
by Marco Hogewoning 12 Sep '06

12 Sep '06

Just noticed, after I made a typo on an address the RIPE mailserver responds with 4xx temporary error on a non-existing user. Is this deliberate and why not send a 5xx permanen failure. -- aut-dbm(a)ripe.net SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<aut-dbm(a)ripe.net>: host postboy.ripe.net [193.0.0.201]: 450 <aut-dbm(a)ripe.net>: Recipient address rejected: Try again later: retry timeout exceeded -- Grtx, MarcoH

2 1

Re: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385]
by Katie Petrusha 08 Sep '06

08 Sep '06

Dear Antoin, It is certainly possible to add a new organisation object type, like "ENUM", to be specifically used by the ENUM registries. This would involve the changes to the RIPE Database. I suggest you to contact ENUM-WG and DB-WG working group chairs to check first whether this change would require only a mailing list consensus or PDP, and then maybe put together a proposal for ENUM-WG and DB-WG and submit it to the appropriate mailing lists. -- Katie Petrusha RIPE NCC > > From: "Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren(a)sidn.nl> > > Date: 4 September 2006 2:26:40PM GMT+02:00 > > To: <enum-wg(a)ripe.net> > > Cc: <ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net> > > Subject: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385 > > Message-Id: <B33086268D53A0429A3AA2774C83892CDC5850(a)KAEVS1.SIDN.local> > > > > Guys, > > > > I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I > > found out when I had to use them last week. > > > > The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the > > registration. > > > > This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. > > RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field. > > > > I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world, > > but I > > do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry > > for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM. > > > > Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries > > here > > ? > > > > Antoin Verschuren > > > > Technical Advisor > > Policy & Business Development > > SIDN > > Utrechtseweg 310 > > PO Box 5022 > > 6802 EA Arnhem > > The Netherlands > > > > T +31 26 3525510 > > F +31 26 3525505 > > M +31 6 23368970 > > E antoin.verschuren(a)sidn.nl > > W http://www.sidn.nl/

4 3

[enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385
by Antoin Verschuren 04 Sep '06

04 Sep '06

Guys, I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I found out when I had to use them last week. The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the registration. This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field. I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world, but I do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM. Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries here ? Antoin Verschuren Technical Advisor Policy & Business Development SIDN Utrechtseweg 310 PO Box 5022 6802 EA Arnhem The Netherlands T +31 26 3525510 F +31 26 3525505 M +31 6 23368970 E antoin.verschuren(a)sidn.nl W http://www.sidn.nl/

1 0