>Peter, if you need to communicate with us, as a non-member,
>then ncc(a)ripe.net works, as well as the telephone.
Last time when I communicated with ripe-dbm,
I think I didn't have to specify my reg.id ;-)
Wilfried ( https://cert.aco.net/ )
_________________________________:_____________________________________
Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber(a)CC.UniVie.ac.at
UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...there's no place like 127.0.0.1 (or ::1 ?)
RIPE-301 (specifically about closed registries) 3.8:
"In cases where End Users of an LIR keep the address space assigned to them
after the LIR closes, the LIR maintainer in the database objects
representing these assignments needs to be removed and replaced by the RIPE
NCC maintainer. The LIR should provide the RIPE NCC with a list of relevant
database objects agreeing to the RIPE NCC overwriting the current LIR
maintainer."
OK, I missed this as "my" LIR was closed due to non-payment after my
previous "issues". That not-withstanding, the actualy allocations to
end-users remain, and should be maintainable, even if very slowly, somehow.
RIPE-301 does not (in 4.0) imply that end-user assignments (and ASes) are
automatically removed where an LIR is closed by RIPE - in fact it implies
the opposite, but doesn't say it explicity.
If we get to the situation where the object would have been correctly and
timely changed to the NCC maintainer, it appears that the current robot
behaviour would still be the same;
This page implies that it is *impossible* to communicate with RIPE unless
you are an LIR:
http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/registration/status.html
There is a chasm here between RIPE-301 and hostmaster(a)ripe.net etc. Is there
a (poublic) solution ?
rgds,
--
Peter
Hi All,
For the NCC Services WG at RIPE49 we'd like to see more participation from
the members, as well as the general presentation provided by the RIPE NCC.
So with that in mind we'd like to ask for you, the members and RIPE
Community to come forward and suggest a presentation outlining your
experience with the RIPE NCC and its services. This can include anything
from experiences you have had with a recent merger or idea's/issues you've
had with the LIR Portal that you would like to share.
As this Working Group has been set-up explicitly for the RIPE NCC members
and the RIPE Community to discuss the services of the RIPE NCC, your active
participation is appreciated. Without active involvement of the membership
and the RIPE Community it is difficult for the RIPE NCC to gauge our
expectations with regards to the services it provides.
We would like to encourage anyone that would like to make a presentation or
raise a topic for discussion to please contact either Kurtis
<kurtis(a)kurtis.pp.se> or myself <bsanghani(a)flagtelecom.com> and we'll
arrange a spot in the agenda.
Best regards,
Bijal Sanghani
FLAG Telecom
**********************************************************************
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named above and contains information which is or may be
confidential, non-public or legally privileged. Any dissemination or
distribution of this message other than to its intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose
the contents to any other person. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us by email to postmaster(a)flagtelecom.com immediately and delete the
original message and all copies from all locations in your computer systems.
This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for viruses. However, FLAG
Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a
result of software viruses.
**********************************************************************
This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - www.mailcontrol.com
