Re: [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024

Dear colleagues! The €10,400.00 is the result of the calculator. You can try it out, I get this result for 7 x IPv4 /22, 7 x IPv6 /29 and 3 x ASNs. No transfers, no PI space. Here is a screenshot: https://imgur.com/vVnHTyG Anyway, this scheme is not fair due to the capping. It raises the costs for small and mid-sized companies dramatically while huge companies are not affected. I think there are only two ways. Either 1. all should pay the same or 2. all exactly as many IPv4 addresses and ASNs they hold (*). (*) IPv6 should not be punished. These category instead of real-usage based schemes make no sense for me. They are not fair as they stop on the half way.

On 13/04/2023 17:32, Akayo wrote:
The €10,400.00 is the result of the calculator. You can try it out, I get this result for 7 x IPv4 /22, 7 x IPv6 /29 and 3 x ASNs. No transfers, no PI space. Here is a screenshot: https://imgur.com/vVnHTyG
There is something wrong with your calculator: https://imgur.com/rNayflF 2900 EUR Kind regards, Sebastien Brossier

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Akayo wrote:
Dear colleagues!
The €10,400.00 is the result of the calculator. You can try it out, I get this result for 7 x IPv4 /22, 7 x IPv6 /29 and 3 x ASNs. No transfers, no PI space. Here is a screenshot: https://imgur.com/vVnHTyG
I put the same values to the calculator and got category scores 5 and 4 (IPv4/IPv6), not 5 and 10 like in your case, resulting in 2900 EUR. Do not you have some noise entered below in the IPv6 allocation column? -- Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
participants (3)
-
Akayo
-
Ondrej Zajicek
-
Sebastien Brossier