Charging scheme draft again
Hello! Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce, except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question: "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time, PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?" Thanks for Your advices! -- Dmitry Kiselev
Salut, On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:05:21AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce, except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question: "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time, PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?"
Because those ressources don't belong to the LIR and are already billed separately I'd think. Kind regards, Tonnerre -- SyGroup GmbH Tonnerre Lombard Solutions Systematiques Tel:+41 61 333 80 33 Güterstrasse 86 Fax:+41 61 383 14 67 4053 Basel Web:www.sygroup.ch tonnerre.lombard@sygroup.ch
Hello! On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:05:21AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce, except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question: "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time, PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?"
Because those ressources don't belong to the LIR and are already billed separately I'd think.
No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that. And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias for LIR's score/fee calculation. Why? Why DA better/worse than LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C. -- Dmitry Kiselev
Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that. And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias for LIR's score/fee calculation. Why? Why DA better/worse than LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C.
I support this question and would like to understand also. Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009@is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
participants (3)
-
Bernard Dugas -
Dmitry Kiselev -
Tonnerre Lombard