5 Jun
2012
5 Jun
'12
8:37 a.m.
On 06/05/2012 01:30 AM, Lu Heng wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
On 5 jun. 2012, at 01:03, Lu Heng wrote:
[...]
NAT has limited functionality, yes, but for most cable network users, that functionality is enough for them.
Might be true, but I like a world where everybody can run any service on their IP addresses without jumping through NAT hoops.
We are jumping though NAT hoops already these days, look at Chinese market, the largest internet user base, they are living an happy life with their carrier NAT for years.
Well, they are living behind a big firewall anyway. So if we as non-Chinese worry about them doing NAT, maybe that should worry us more. Regards, Stefan