Hello together
I agree on this, there has to be an option D
“No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget” in my opinion,
otherwise the proposal should be rejected.
Best regards
Matias
Thank you for that clarification.
As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected
and sent back to the board until a fourth option of
no-change is added.
On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham
wrote:
Dear Rob,
The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as the Executive Board election is run.
So members would be asked to vote for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or second round would be deemed to have been chosen.
Hope that helps.
Fergal
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net