On 27/03/2012 19:07, sergey myasoedov wrote:
From my opinion that is too much. No more than 250-300 members are usually attending GM, even with the electronic voting. And 2% threshold means ~50% of active members, so there is no possibility to raise any question to the GM level.
And this is the reason for my proposal: to change the threshold in the section 15.6 of AoA to 0.3% or to 30 or 40 members.
I think that the 2% limit is about the right level for something to be "forced" onto the agenda. Is the issue that you want to add things to the agenda and you're assuming that this is the only route? Have you spoke to the EB about this? If that's the case maybe creating a process for the EB to consider motions with a lower submission threshold might be more appropriate (if there isn't one already)? The EB could be free to amend or reject any suggestion as they see fit and if the EB decide not to progress it you can always follow the direct route above. J -- James Blessing +44 7989 039 476 Strategic Relations Manager, EMEA Limelight Networks