Confidential/Конфіденційно
Hello Kurtis!
I think there is one more circle. Some members simply want to increase the cost of ownership IPv4 address space.
Perhaps, from their point of view, this will result in some IPv4 addresses being transferred back to RIPE.
P.S. I believe it is not, a lot of reasons why.
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>
On Behalf Of Kurtis Lindqvist
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 11:56 AM
To: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>; Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss@nepustil.net>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
You don't often get email from
kurtis@linx.net.
Learn why this is important |
Hi Kaj!
Isn’t this really at the heart of the problem. In a Venn diagram there are (at least) three circles here, the members with an opinion the mailinglist who want to crystalise the core services and
keep RIPE NCC costs lower and see greater efficiency gains, there is the circle of members who respond to the membership survey and are happy and want to keep all services as they are and then there is a circle of the members who actually vote (and possibly
manage the payments). I am not convinced there is a great overlap of these circles and so we end up in a situation with very little guidance.
Best Regards,
- kurtis -
--
Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO
T: +44 (0) 20 7645 3528 | www.linx.net
London Internet Exchange Ltd (LINX)
C/O WeWork, 2 Minister Court, London, EC3R 7BB, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 3137929