Kurtis, actually the issue is that EB presented the model A, B, C which are almost all the same just a little bit different, and offer no ability to reject, if you abstain your vote is not counted. The most outrageous is that it is enough 27 members to vote for one of this plan to be implemented/accepted. And other members 700+ who are against it nobody cares about them.

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:31 PM Kurtis Lindqvist <kurtis@linx.net> wrote:

Not to quibble but I think we need to be a bit more precise. The members have not formally accepted the activity plan, the Executive Board have. The members where provided the chance to give input on the activity plan.

 

While this might not seem like a major difference, I think part of the problem is exactly this. Perhaps the members SHOULD vote on the activity plan? At least the members might read it then…..

 

Best Regards,

 

- kurtis -

--

Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO

T: +44 (0) 20 7645 3528 | www.linx.net

b8dd7c7e-5b7a-4bb3-bf55-4265639a41be

London Internet Exchange Ltd (LINX)
C/O WeWork, 2 Minister Court, London, EC3R 7BB, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 3137929
09f5285b-9bf5-4663-a1d5-f335264499f80ab2af08-4510-4094-a068-c92129623c5c34761a22-8ab1-4259-b5a4-c45509cfc94a591060a6-addb-47a4-a833-1c93e4b644f4

 

From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2024 at 13:49
To: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity

On 16. 5. 24 14:33, Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf wrote:
> "put something forward"...
>
> Many members have put forward potential schemes on this list.
> Many members have put forward and voted for a point to be added to the
> agenda regarding the charging scheme (checking, this proposal has more
> than 700 signatures to date).
>
> To wich the boards reaction was basically  them not adding any options
> based on feedback.... Then when people appear to be complaing about
> that
This has been repeated for the n-th time already.

EB can't put an option of a lower budget (and members fee) on the agenda
as they need to follow the (accepted by RIPE NCC members) activity plan
and assure the budget for it. Period. At this point lower budget is not
possible.

You are all barking at the wrong tree. When the activity plan comes into
a discussion at (and prior to the GM) - that's the time to start
proposing changes if you really want them.

Cheers, Jan


_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7Ckurtis%40linx.net%7Cc8f2c9373bae477f4d0d08dc75a6a315%7C568b2c3522ad4ee08b90f034db231579%7C0%7C0%7C638514605795570614%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Cks9L02OzgAOQ2JncbCXYvvU4Xu0Wh5OqUNchEekcac%3D&reserved=0
Unsubscribe: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fkurtis%2540linx.net&data=05%7C02%7Ckurtis%40linx.net%7Cc8f2c9373bae477f4d0d08dc75a6a315%7C568b2c3522ad4ee08b90f034db231579%7C0%7C0%7C638514605795581063%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SbMR16X8El%2Fv09Ol6EJP0v8Q%2BfNAr2EN3LJ4OrFK8PA%3D&reserved=0

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albahost.net