data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ea76/7ea76e55a6c15b7be2ec82e23f9796d0b1e7ecdb" alt=""
Why you want remove your AS from IX routing list? You want that your prefixes does not get routed to some part of internet? Correct if I am wrong but for me that looks more like that at least someone (atman) do filtering even for tier1 operators and at least in theory it should be good thing. On 30.10.2018 16:27, José Manuel Giner wrote:
Hi, we checked that our AS is present in the macro: AS24748:AS-THINX (they have thousands of AS in their macro)
After contacting atman.pl who is responsible for this macro, they tell me:
It appears that AS59432 is contained in one of our customers AS-SETs and it is automatically added to our AS-SET AS24748:AS-THINX
As soon as they remove AS59432, it will disappear from AS24748:AS-THINX
We have asked him how we can find out who that customer is. But their answer doesn't give us any information.
Please be kindly informed that our macros are being built automatically according to our customers` macros. If your AS happens to be removed from whichever of our customer`s macros, ours is to be changed accordingly.
We are concerned about this situation and do not know how to proceed.
Thank you for your help!
-- F-Solutions Oy Tapio Haapala PL7, 90571 Oulu GSM +358400998371 Skype burner- IRC Burner@ircnet