Hi, On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:21:48PM +0200, David Br??ha wrote:
But after seeing the new updated calculator we would definitely return part of our IPv6 allocation if the charging scheme category A should be chosen. The "free" enlargement from /32 to /29 suddenly costs 350 Euro per year.
Uh. I did not see this, but this looks like a very very bad idea. ARIN does this ("a /36 costs less than a /32") and it's a very bad idea, because it encourages conservation where IPv6 should bring in sufficient address space to enjoy the benefits, like, simplicity in end user assignments. So NCC, are you serious about that? This suggestion affects address policy, which is not your job to do, and the *size* of an IPv6 allocation does not affect the costs caused by it. Very bad idea. Gert Doering -- formerly involved in address policy -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279