Thanks for clarification.

The main meaning or/and idea of my question was that they don`t think about that they DO NOT participate in RIPE community but condemn it`s decision.

And I tried to explain that always necessary need to consider the issue from all angles and to understand that if you want something you need to do something.

In our case "something" is to participate when such decisions are made and/or suggest other ways to resolve the problem.
I will remind problem: IPv4 ended, IP`s still needed, no not used IP`s returned
And not just write "Hey, RIPE, your decision is bad".

Have a good weekends.

С наилучшими пожеланиями :: With best regards,
Дмитрий Николаев :: Dmitry Nikolaev

On 29.11.2019 18:18, Carlos Friaças wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019, NOC wrote:

(...)

So, it`s all of us.
And so anyone, who don`t agree or wants to change something goes to RIPE meeting and tell it there.

Can I ask ? Anyone who wrote "+1" and/or "I agree" in previous letters, was on RIPE`s meeting ?
I think the answer will be "NO".

(...)

Going to RIPE meetings is not something absolutely necessary to "change the rules", because the PDP and all related discussions really happen on working group mailing lists.

Please see:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/policy-development-process-info-pdf
(There is a "Want to make or change policies?" box...)

These are the four current policy proposals:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-proposals

Anyone can issue a new proposal. It just takes some effort.

Regards,
Carlos