Precisely.

 

What is important now is for the result to be accepted and move on. Arriving at either of the options in the 2027 Charging Scheme Proposal was the culmination of a great deal of effort and refinement of recent previous attempts. It became THE Vote. The big one! Could this be the one where the category model finally wins? No.

 

To be asked to vote again on this within the next few years should be considered disrespectful to the membership and the vote they hold. I strongly suspect that irrespective on which side of the coin you are, most don’t want to be asked again any time soon either.

 

Brian

 

 

Brian Storey
Principal; Data Products & Network Planning
Tel: 
0333 240 3481
Mobile: 
07436 101 378
Email: 
Brian.Storey@gamma.co.uk
This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster@gamma.co.uk

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at Arbeta, 11 Northampton Road, Manchester, M40 5BP and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.

From: Andy Davidson <Andy.Davidson@ask4.com>
Sent: 22 May 2026 15:55
To: Stephen Carter (Fujitsu) <stephen.carter2@fujitsu.com>; members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Proposals - result announced.

 

On 22 May 2026, at 13:20, Stephen Carter (Fujitsu) via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
> So, a member pays half of the flat fee and half of the category fee

> – as I could see some members having a large increase in their

> fees if 75% are better off – and that ‘jump’ may not be budgeted for.

No.  The option B was the voting scheme with large jumps and it did not pass. 

 

The meeting was asked to reach a decision. It decided that in this membership of equals, we should contribute equally and be treated equally. 

Rare that I am the majority side of a 51/49 split in a referendum, but I really do feel the answer reached is the right one, for a membership organisation, in the long term. 

Andy

 

This email and its contents may be confidential. Access is only authorised by the intended recipient. The contents of this email may not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the intended recipient, or stored or copied in any medium. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately. ASK4 Ltd. Registered in England & Wales with company number 3980594. Registered Address: Devonshire Green House, 14 Fitzwilliam Street, Sheffield, S1 4JL. ASK4 Ltd is part of the ASK4 Group which operates in Europe through various local branches and/or separate and distinct legal entities.