Yes. I can (almost) accept that for a national election (and that is debatable), but for a NGO/NPO, where the voting members are considered as experts in their field, it sounds a bit off. David
Le 14 mai 2024 à 13:38, Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> a écrit :
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks.
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/david.ponzone%40ipeva...