Vevida, The specs you can see in my first post. Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now. Now let us all be quiet and respect the list. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject. Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing. Regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io