1. The IP address fee has already been discussed. Unfortunately, most of the proposals were ignored by the leadership of the NCC. As a consequence - the failure of the vote and the reduction of the budget. 2. If the NCC manages the shared space, spending money on monitoring infrastructure and RPKI, then why can't it spend money on creating and promoting protocol compatibility and education (popularizing educational materials on the protocol in different languages)? Especially if this will be done at the expense of paying for the use of an outdated protocol, the lack of addresses in which brings problems to NCC members?
You’re really going to have to explain this in detail
How much do you want RIPE to charge per IP?
Why would anyone agree to paying this?
At what point in time did RIPE become responsible for “fixing” IPv6 v IPv4?
Will RIPE start making hardware?
I’m absolutely fascinated to hear how this will all work.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Date: Friday, 3 November 2023 at 08:54 To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@interall.co.il> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>, Hans Petter Holen <hph+announce@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
My opinion remains the same! The main task of RIPE NCC is to manage the IP address space. And unfortunately we are not doing well with this.
We need to introduce a fee for EACH IPv4 IP address, and the amounts received should be directed to the development of IPv6 and the mechanisms of its compatibility with IPv4. For example, the development of mechanisms like IPv8.
We should direct our efforts not to reduce the budget, but to solve the general problem of the address space.
On 02/11/2023 17:31, Kaj Niemi wrote:
Hi,
First, I think it is important to note that /something/ was done. They did reduce the expenditure by 3.8% (budgeted 2023 vs forecasted 2023). Could they have reduced it more? Probably, but by how much more is debatable.
This is excellent news and it shows that the EB is listening to its members. Lets hope that in future years, the budget can be further reduced by 1-3%.
Regards, Hank
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/michele%40blacknight....
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.