On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, at 21:14, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
On 3/8/23 15:14, Sander Steffann wrote:
I feel this model double-charges for PI and ASN. LIRs with many of those resources both pay €50 per resource, and also run the risk of being pushed up into a higher category. I strongly feel that PI and ASN should be excluded from the category score calculation.
Absolutely!
This looks like double charge to me as well.
I'm also wondering why out of the sudden there should be a fee for ASNs - to the best of my knowledge they aren't as scarce resources, not even the 16bit ASNs.
So I strongly object to introducing charges for ASNs here and also strongly object to having sponsored resources count into the number of resources used to decide which category an LIR falls into (IF this was considered a good way forward)
this is something not quite obvious from the calculator and description -- would like NCC to clarify. Are we going to count other parties’ resources when assessing our fees?
As of today I have to say "No" to both proposals though, as I don't see how just increasing costs and thereby impacting smaller LIRs (who might sponsor a number of resources) can be a way forward.
Likewise.