On 12/04/2024 10:56, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:59:37AM +0200, Sebastien Brossier wrote:
Correct, but the question is: is it ok for the option to reject the proposed resolution to be missing ?
This option would take away the necessary resources for the NCC to do what they presented at the autumn AGM. So, yes, this would be a very poor choice.
The question is not "if" this is the budget, the question is "how can the costs for this budget be distributed?". So "no!" can not be a valid choice for that question.
Hi, I agree that a rejection is not desirable and would put the NCC in a difficult situation. All voting options should result in the same budget. I'm not asking if it is desirable, but if it is *legal* to remove the choice to reject a proposal. I think it is better to ask the question now, rather than take the risk of seeing someone challenge the vote result later. Regards, Sebastien Brossier