14 Jul
2012
14 Jul
'12
2:05 a.m.
On 14.07.2012 02:46, LIR wrote:
So, let's charge per resource usage ...
AFAIK, RIPE NCC is NOT a merchant of numbering resources. It is not selling goods, but rather provides a service to community. If we were to charge "per usage", then the annual number of humanly processed tickets should be taken for qualifying LIRs. More allocated addresses doesn't automatically mean more requests, and more load on RIPE NCC. There might be LIRs with rather large address space allocated, which nevertheless send only few requests, which needed human processing. Why such LIR should pay more than a LIR sending a lot of requests/applications every day? Regards, D.Sidelnikov