On 23 Sep 2021, at 08:32, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:48:13AM +0000, Kurtis Lindqvist wrote:
You seem to focus on the easy of the transfer market only but the that is not the NCCs goal, far from it. NCC has other, and in my view much more important objectives they need to fulfil to protect us all. To do this they need to uphold processes that might impact the speed of the transfer market, but I personally think that is a price worth paying for a robust system and community trust. That said, the checks should be streamlined and effective, but not compromise the integrity of the data.
I totally agree with the requirement for a strong and correct registry.
Nonetheless, RS response times for really simple things ("I want an IPv6 network, for an established LIR, no doubts on identity") have also not been exactly SLA compliant - "holding up all the easy requests because there are concurrent complicated ones" is not making happy customers.
This comes down to management priorities…
Obviously the SLA should be met, but I deliberately left that out of my comment as I wanted to focus on not eroding the stringent controls. - kurtis -