Hello, Why not to have a some rule to forbid IPv4 transfer from last /8 RIPE block for 3 or even 5 years? This will prevent companies to register LIR just for selling addresses. This of course is very strict, but some restriction like this can help. Best regards, Misak Khachatryan, Network Administration and Monitoring Department Manager, GNC- ALFA CJSC 1 Khaghaghutyan str., Abovyan, 2201 Armenia Tel: +374 60 46 99 70 (9670), Mob.: +374 55 19 98 40 URL: www.rtarmenia.am On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua> wrote:
On 16.02.16 14:46, Thomas Mangin wrote:
1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a problem that must be prevented?
It is. The RIPE NCC policies should be written in a way which is beneficial to its community.
It is NOT. The problem is not a secondary LIR account itself, but an additional /22 allocated to same company.
So quick way is to change policy and say every *COMPANY* should receive one /22, not every *LIR*.
P.S. By the way, if there are several LIR accounts binded to one company, how many votes do that company have at General Meeting?
---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.